As the STAAR test became a large focus within my school, I completely changed many of my lessons. Our school became very data driven, and we had monthly meetings and district-wide unit tests, that allowed us to see where the students' strengths and weaknesses were. I really found this useful, because I was able to see where I needed to foucs more of my attention.
As a capmus, our main focus became that of rigor, and I needed to focus more of my lessons around the process of analyzing and applying knowledge. As I mentioned in my previous post, I no longer could act a a giver of information; I was now needing to focus on becomming more of a facilitator. As I began to reshape the scope of my lessons, I began with goals for each unit - essential questions that I wanted to make sure my students were able to answer at the close of each unit.
A couple years ago, I read about "flipping the classroom", a decided to implement this idea in my classroom. This new idea was was learner-centered, in that I did not orally give them the information they needed. Instead, I referred to the KHAN Academy and John Green's youtube series, and various written sources sent home, and the students were to learn the content on their own in thier homes. This way, the class period would be devoted to applying thier knew and prior knowledge. I created projects that would require them to apply thier knowledge, and in class lessons that required the students to analyze various ideas, as well as make decisions about how they felt about the things they were learning. My goal was to make World History relatable, so that they were able to apply the histoical content with real world issues. For example, when studying the Agricultural Revolution that occurred at the dawn of civilization, I had the studetns read about the causes and effects of the revolution, as well as compare and contrast that time with revolutions that might be occurring today. They had to decide whether they belived the postitive effects outweighted bad, and they were able to do this by using thier access to the web to reserach all the effects that Agriculture has had on our planet.
In order to measure the outcome of their learning in a meaningful way, I like to use DBQ's. DBQ's, are document based questions essays that require the students to analyze primary and secondary sources, in order to write an essay over various themes in History. Using these sources, the students are require to make important decisions about how they feel about the content. By reading thier essays, I am able to distinguish whether or not they have learned to make the content applicable. This is an excellent way for me to evaluate thier learning. Another way to evaluate thier learning, is that I have the students use our computer labs to create documentaries, movie trailers, and blogs. I love the blogs, because the students are very in tune with any type of social media, and they seem to involve themselves much more in the learning process.
The only portion of the six charactrstics that I have not been able to apply to my classroom, is team effort. Social Studies is unable to have common planning periods, and outside planning groups, because the majority of our teachers in that content area are coaches. They have very busy schedules and all of them have the same conference periods and athletic periods, leaving those of non-coaches to fill in for those class periods they are not in the classroom. I have seen two subject areas benefit greatly from working as a team and having common planning periods. Our Science and Math departments have heavily followed all six of these characteristics and the over success rate has been astronomical. It is evident to me that by reshaping their entire system, they have been able to reach so many students. They plan together, make use of technology, create innovative lessons that encourage the students to apply their knowledge on a DAILY basis. By doing these things, those two core areas have seen a great deal of success.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Week 1 Question #1
It was no surprise to read that the definition of Instructional Design has changed for the last 50 years. Technology has changed and with that came the realization that education practices should change as well. It seems that it was not until the late 1970's that the analysis portion of learning became a topic of discussion. This was not shocking to me, because as I began my career in 2001, it was still a common practice to have a sit and get style approach in the classroom. Teachers refused to give up their role as the provider of facts, and worksheets and movies were amongst the most common practices used in the classroom. Between the 70's and 90's there was a huge shift in technology when it came to computers. I remember being in high school (late 90's) and we there was no Internet on my campus, and in college, I still used all books for my resources when writing a research paper. So when I began my teaching career, the push for the use of technology within our curriculum was not a big topic of discussion. In fact, we had that 60's and 70's mindset of media in the classroom is instructional design. Over the last 20-30 years, the definition of Instructional Design has changed in a few important ways: 1) it became apparent that the learner needed to be able to analyze what they are learning; 2) the ultimate goal for education became the "improvement of learning"; 3) teachers and professors are being held more accountable in their teaching approach.; and 4) In order for humans to be successful, they need to learn by the instructor and on their own.
Honestly, at the beginning of my career it was easy to fall into the old school mentality of how students should learn. Also, I love the subject I teach, so I enjoyed standing in front of my class and making History come alive through storytelling. The main problem with this, however, is that my students were getting more and more advanced in technology themselves, that I was starting to lose them. They needed so much more than what I was giving them. They didn't (and don't) need me to give them all the information from the content - then can find that with the touch of a finger and click of a mouse - they needed to learn how to think deeply and apply their knowledge. Therefore, in the last few years, I have changed the makeup of my classroom and have begun giving up my role as the giver of information and have taken on a more facilitating role.
Honestly, at the beginning of my career it was easy to fall into the old school mentality of how students should learn. Also, I love the subject I teach, so I enjoyed standing in front of my class and making History come alive through storytelling. The main problem with this, however, is that my students were getting more and more advanced in technology themselves, that I was starting to lose them. They needed so much more than what I was giving them. They didn't (and don't) need me to give them all the information from the content - then can find that with the touch of a finger and click of a mouse - they needed to learn how to think deeply and apply their knowledge. Therefore, in the last few years, I have changed the makeup of my classroom and have begun giving up my role as the giver of information and have taken on a more facilitating role.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)